whenhe played the idol. he turned every1 on his first tribe agianst
him.he didnt tellhe had it.
and the words out he tried to join up with the new tribe.

russells always trying to join up with the wrong person. n when they
tell him they dont need him.hes out to boot they off. n hes been real
busy.poor russ. no1 needs him.....lol

'The Perfesser' ADDED:

"whenhe played the idol. he turned every1 on his first tribe agianst
him.he didnt tellhe had it.
and the words out he tried to join up with the new tribe."

5 minutes to Wapner...and imagine Tom Cruise taking care of HIM.

:-)

Perfesser Wald said:

"russells always trying to join up with the wrong person. n when they
tell him they dont need him.hes out to boot they off. n hes been real
busy.poor russ. no1 needs him.....lol"

10 minutes to Wapner.

Heck achieving a million "net worth" is no great accomplishment. Given
my what the provincial assessment authority says my house is worth (at
least for tax purposes) and RRSP (what you 'Mericans would call a 401
plan) I'm most of the way there now.

Which is not to say I have even 1/10 of that in liquid capital even if
I liquidated the kids' education funds!

"Wealth" doesn't start until the $5-10 million personal net worth
catagory - we're doing a bit better than surviving from paycheck to
paycheck but if you could see my den ... well it's nicer than the den
in Russell's pictures but I've got a long way to go to get even to
JP's level.

(Who I would assume has a nice apartment but an even nicer bank
account given what he is reputed to make per season with lower than
usual living expenses due to having been out of the country at least
half the year since 2000 - that tends to encourage saving particularly
with no wife and kids to provide for!)

On 2009-11-06 06:49:22 -0600, d...@webtv.net said:

WOW! You don't like him so you make fun of his  kid then say it is a
child molester. Yeah Russell is bad but you..................

In article <dfj8f5la6j1m4tvihc172o06vlqn3t3...@4ax.com>,
lcra...@home.ca says...
---
If you are going to answer "Just Me" then answer him directly, not
through my or anyone else's post. Netiqette. I don't want people
mistaking someone else's post for mine.  
--
----->Hunter

"No man in the wrong can stand up against
 a fellow that's in the right and keeps on acomin'."

               -----William J. McDonald
           Captain, Texas Rangers from 1891 to 1907

news:4ebdb15a-5d36-46f3-aaf4-b7c2960d52d4@m25g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...

I am a millionaire and I live in a small house that you'd assume a welfare
recipiant lived there until you walked inside and saw about 100 grand worth
of electronics. Some millionaires don't flaunt their money, hell I drive a
2003 truck.

Especially if you ignore his liabilities.  In reality, his actual net
worth could be close to zero.

James H. said about my comments:

"WOW! You don't like him so you make fun of his kid then say it is a
child molester. Yeah Russell is bad but you.................."

Think as you wish.

Most topics have been used in humor. The Holocaust (you DO believe that
it happened, right?)...death, race and stereotypes.

When an old 80 year old comic...(not many left)...but let's say Don
Rickles...is onstage...and a beautiful 22 year old girl comes out as
part of the show...and he sez: 'Want some candy little girl?'...it gets
a laugh (well maybe not if you're Amish or a Mormon).

Everyone knows what it refers to...but people don't over react.

It's the same with 14 year old bride and grooms who live in the
south...or incest stereotypes...they're JOKES!

(And, btw, it's interesting that you focused on 'child molester'...and
not 'incest'.)

I am quite comfortable about how I perceive others, and my morals allow
me to rest easy.

Geez...you want to cut out all 'priest' jokes TOO?

(And don't pretend you don't know what THAT'S about.)

Dr. Boo said:

"I am a millionaire and I live in a small house that you'd assume a
welfare recipiant lived there until you walked inside and saw about 100
grand worth of electronics. Some millionaires don't flaunt their money,
hell I drive a 2003 truck."

I HEAR ya bro. Nobody even SUSPECTS that I have a second mortgage on my
Amana box.

On Nov 8, 6:54 am, d...@webtv.net wrote:

Just a guess here, but maybe "incest" wasn't mentioned because you at
least had the decency to say - if they had not been related-- yadda
yadda yadda.

Also, not all those guilty of incestuous relationships warrant the
title of being a ~>child<~ molester.  When it comes to kids being
sexually violated by some creepy adult, those creeps ARE ~>child
molesters<~ whether they are related to the child or not.

Your reply was weak to deflect like that.  I don't like Russell one
little bit but you already know that I was very disturbed by your
remarks too.  Not only because that man has never done a damn thing to
suggest that he would ever take advantage of any child in a sexual
way...  but mostly because that little girl didn't deserve for her
daddy to has such vile comments made about him merely because of the
tactics used in playing some tv game.

Pity that you didn't reply in a public forum the same way that you had
to me in email.  I had actually appreciated that reply and thought
that you had class to admit that was wrong and apologize.  Now I think
it was probably just a bunch of hot air or there wouldn't be such a
drastic difference between what you said then and what you said here.

Bottom line... your comments WHERE extreme, a hit below the belt and
unjustified.

'just me' said to me:

"Your reply was weak to deflect like that. I don't like Russell one
little bit but you already know that I was very disturbed by your
remarks too. Not only because that man has never done a damn thing to
suggest that he would ever take advantage of any child in a sexual
way... but mostly because that little girl didn't deserve for her daddy
to has such vile comments made about him merely because of the tactics
used in playing some tv game.

Pity that you didn't reply in a public forum the same way that you had
to me in email. I had actually appreciated that reply and thought that
you had class to admit that was wrong and apologize. Now I think it was
probably just a bunch of hot air or there wouldn't be such a drastic
difference between what you said then and what you said here.

Bottom line... your comments WHERE extreme, a hit below the belt and
unjustified."

Well...let me say this about that...I don't dislike Russell all that
much. Most of what I say is in jest.

His constant berating of women...and branding them as stupid...doesn't
help his case about raising daughters with proper values and
self-respect.

I DID write and tell you that incest isn't funny...and that it's a
serious problem that maybe shouldn't be joked about. I apologized for
offending you. You are free to post everything, as I stand by what I
say.

However...if you appreciated it so much...why the silence?

I asked that you reply to ME...not a post in the GROUP.

"I" post in the group and it may be ignored.

Again, I'm comfortable with MY class...but find it interesting that you
couldn't find the intestinal fortitude to write me BACK...as I had
requested...so we could exchange ideas.

But no...you could not.

I know, I know...deflecting.

I've had psych training as well and 'failing to respond'...speaks a lot
louder than what you call deflecting.

I'm not angry in the least and STILL invite your e-mails...(which you
said was sent in error.)

To miss Russell's horrid mindset towards women, which he shows in every
diary clip and discussion with MEN, and to ignore the stereotype of the
'hillbilly' that we have been joking about since day ONE...makes me
wonder about your agenda.

Again I'll say that incest is not funny...so then maybe we can agree
that he is just a pig as far as women are concerned, a liar, and a
stereotypical southern guy.

Other than that...I find him amusing...he treats women with respect to
their faces, and pleads the case for his honesty very well.

Again...feel free to write.

I'm not sure that's entirely fair. He has said that Laura is
intelligent and seems to respect her game. He even said the same about
Liz but felt he needed to get rid of her because she was a threat to
him. His 'dumbass girls alliance' formed because the women in that
alliance believed his lies and have proved fairly easy to manipulate
for him. So while it's not a nice thing to he's got a reason for
calling them stupid, in the game sense, since he's done a lot and none
of them have caught on. Or at least so the editing would lead us to
believe.

You also have to remember that he seems to know the game well, and so
is probably doing a lot to get camera time. I don't think it's
entirely an accident that most of the show titles are coming from
things Russell says. He puts on an act for the players and I think he
puts one on for the cameras too.

The fact that this is being said now compared to 5-6 weeks ago speaks
volumes about how little we've seen of Galu so far. (Not that I
disagree with you!)

Anybody who has listened to Jeff Foxworthy almost certainly knows most
of them. You could have made the same point about 14 year old cousins
marrying as a southern stereotype.

(By the by, I once met a lady at a Mormon Family History Center who
said she couldn't use their software because her grandparents came
from a small town in Holland where inter-marriage was rampant. Let's
just say she had significantly less than 16 great great grandparents
and her family tree caused the Mormon software to crash!)

On Nov 7, 6:24 pm, Hunter <buffhun...@my-deja.com> wrote:

I'm not a him.  If I was a man maybe Russell wouldn't bug me as bad as
he does.  A lot of guys seem to enjoy the way he plays the game.  Most
women that think he is playing the game well, don't like him as a
person.  Wonder why?

On Nov 8, 9:25 am, D-W <D...@hotmail.com> wrote:

Sorry to disappoint you Your Crassness, but no... I was never sexually
abused as I child or as an adult.  "Jokes" are supposed to be funny
and anyone that thinks it's comical that this man would or could take
advantage of a young girl like his daughter in a sexual way has bigger
problems than Russell does.  I will defend the rights of kids not to
be used in TASTELESS jokes that involve lewd acts against a minor any
day.  I do it because I happen to know thats kids ARE important enough
to stand up for and be protected.  I know that there isn't a damn
thing funny about making light of something so serious.  If you don't
that's your effing problem, not mine

Shawn said...about my commenting on Russell's feelings toward women:

"I'm not sure that's entirely fair. He has said that Laura is
intelligent and seems to respect her game. He even said the same about
Liz but felt he needed to get rid of her because she was a threat to
him. His 'dumbass girls alliance' formed because the women in that
alliance believed his lies and have proved fairly easy to manipulate for
him. So while it's not a nice thing to he's got a reason for calling
them stupid, in the game sense, since he's done a lot and none of them
have caught on. Or at least so the editing would lead us to believe."

True. Not everything is an ABSOLUTE. (drink up, Shriners)

He was billed as the 'worst villain ever' and PART of that was his
calling women stupid...and how he can control them.

It just fit in with his lies and place of origin.

I don't know what's really true.

'Just Me', who I KNOW is a lady...said to Dubya...

"Sorry to disappoint you Your Crassness, but no... I was never sexually
abused as I child or as an adult. "Jokes" are supposed to be funny and
anyone that thinks it's comical that this man would or could take
advantage of a young girl like his daughter in a sexual way has bigger
problems than Russell does. I will defend the rights of kids not to be
used in TASTELESS jokes that involve lewd acts against a minor any day.
I do it because I happen to know thats kids ARE important enough to
stand up for and be protected. I know that there isn't a damn thing
funny about making light of something so serious. If you don't that's
your effing problem, not mine"

'Your Crassness'...cute...Dub's royalty.

'effing'...you drink the blood and eat the body of Christ with that
mouth?

What you say about kids is true...but then, as 'da goat pointed
out...you must feel the same way about Foxworthy and the rest of the
'blue collar' gents makin' fun of the 'rednecks'.

After all...you are NOT a hypocrite.

On Nov 8, 9:43 am, d...@webtv.net wrote:

I know you didn't see me try to nominate Russell for father of the
year, did you?  There is a reason that I don't like that guy and the
main reason is because of the way that arrogamnt, short, bald, stumpy
guy tries to make himself feel and look like some big man by putting
women down.  No doubt that he has pent up hostility towards women
because he felt looked down upon by them for years.  Like that could
be helped, he's short!  lol  And obnoxious!

None of what you posted has a damn thing to do with criminal act
against a child though.  I didn't know you are from an area where it
is accepted and common practice for a 14 year old girl to marry an
adult man.  Maybe that is why you don't see a huge difference in some
middle aged man making a comment as if he could lure some legal age
adult babe of 22 years old with candy or the same guy saying that to a
girl age 10, 12 or 14.  Blamed the idiot parents that are giving their
consent for those 14 year old girls to marry so young.  Don't use that
or anything else as an excuse to pretend that it's all in fun to make
remarks about any adult taking sexual advantage of any child. Kids
deserve better even if you don't feel the adults do, wouldn't you
agree?

And I'm confused.  I didn't respond to your email here.  I replied to
what you posted when someone else seemed to have a problem with your
comment relating to child molestation.  And I did reply because your
remarks here had a whole different attitude than what you said in
email.  I'm not going to post your email, I have no need to post it.
If you want it posted for some reason than you post it.

As far as me not replying to your email, I never intended to.  I don't
know you or anything about you.  I don't even know if you are a man or
a woman but if I had to take a guess, I would say man.  Regardless,
appreciating what you said in email and seeing that you can be a
bigger person than me (because you had ignored my returned sarcasm to
you about glances and eyesight) doesn't mean I owed you a reply.  For
me it meant that I would be opened to look past any more of your
sarcasm directed towards me to an extent, and not form any concrete
opinion based on first impressions.  It's nothing personal, I don't
normally exchange emails with people I don't know.  If I don't know
the sender, they get deleted.  The only reason that I even opened your
email is because I couldn't post for some reason, the code wasn't
being accepted.  So I checked my email to see if something was sent to
me about being locked out for some reason.  So really, no need to take
my "silence" personal.  I didn't take it personally that you didn't
reply to my apology posted.  You don't know me either therefore owe me
nothing.

Oh yeah, I almost forget... that "agenda".  That was completed in my
very first post here.  Does that mean that I can't stick around and
join in on the discussions if something catches my interest?  The
public forum that I post on is pretty dead, even if it isn't limited
to one topic.  I'm opinionated, enjoy discussions and debates.  Since
this place has a little more going on, agenda #2 was to stay for a
while and jump right in with my 2 cents when so inspired.

Any more questions, ask away if it doesn't bother you to do so in a
public forum.  I have nothing to hide really.  One thing I will not do
is give out my last name, address or phone number to random strangers
in some public forum on the internet.  I'm protective of my family
that way.

On Nov 8, 10:10 am, shawn <nanoflo...@gmail.com> wrote:

I have a sneaky feeling that he calls 20-something babes dumb lots
especially if they are too stupid to immediately see his greatness.
Most smart 20-something women aren't so easily impressed by some
short, stumpy, bald, 30-something man with a missing tooth that is out
to convince them that he runs the show and/or controls everything in
or about his life.  I can only imagine that he has been rejected,
probably even laughed at, by those same type of women numerous times
in his life.  Any women that don't appreciate his Heininess must be
plain stupid!   His overinflated imagine of himself is his way of
overcompensating for his "shortcomings".   He will be seen as a man of
great stature one way or another, even if only in his own little
mind.  :-)

On Nov 8, 9:16 am, D-W <D...@hotmail.com> wrote:

lol  You mean like getting mad and a bit hostile if anyone dares to
make harmless, practical suggestions that would make it easier for
EVERYONE to keep track of some chip / trivia game?  You are right,
some people really should relax and not get so uptight about such
inconsequential stuff.  In the bigger scheme of life, there are far
more important issues that should evoke anger and justifiably so.  :-)

On Nov 9, 7:55 am, d...@webtv.net wrote:

Nope, can't say that I was ever into redneck jokes.  I liked watching
the show Reba a whole lot, does that count?

I have watched Foxworthy before, probably never sat and watched a
whole show but I thought that blue collar humor was more about making
fun of the way rednecks talk, dimwitted people, jokes about the wives,
and in-laws, junk around the property and yes--- even incest.  Didn't
know those "jokes", if that is what you must call them, include young
minor children with older men though.  What two consenting adults do,
even if related, is not the same as an adult sexual predator violating
of minor children.

I'm kind of surprised to know that Foxworthy takes his jokes there
actually.  I guess that is part of the problem why some states still
do not enforce much stricter penalties on those found guilty of sexual
misconduct with a minor child.  Too many people see it as a joke, not
such a big deal, not such a grievous act.   I guess you are telling me
that is a part of a normal lifestyle in areas of our country even
today.  And that is sad. I thought that we had laws in place now to
protect our children because it was finally realized that minors can
be more easily influenced and manipulated by adults beings that their
brains are not fully developed and will make foolish choices.  Even if
a 13/14 year old pursued a sexual relationship with an adult, it is
still a crime.  The adults are the ones that should know better and
are fully aware that is a crime regardless.  But with the attitudes
out there these offenders will continue to get a slap on the hand and
be back out on the streets to offend again. Someday maybe that will
change.

For the record and it's something that I have had more exposure to
over these redneck jokes... were tons of jokes floating around about
Michael Jackson over the years.  I may have gotten a chuckle or two
about the jokes that had to do with his nose, skin color, hair
catching on fire, etc--- but I never found any of the jokes relating
to him abusing boys funny.  For me (and that will never change) I feel
it is a complete disregard to all children that are victims of sexual
abuse to think there is anything funny about that. Those type of jokes
hit the victims way harder than Michael Jackson or any other adult
because our children do deserve to be shown care and concern, to be
protected.  Not make fun of the tragedies that they have endured at
the hands of some sick adult.   I have a lot more respect for kids to
ever think it is a joking matter.

Re: 'Just Me's' comments...

'I'm a man...I spell 'M'..A...N...MAN. '

I love the fact that you join in the forum...and say whatever you wish.

You DID respond in a post by saying that you sent an e-mail to some
people by mistake...and you didn't want to bother anyone, and it
wouldn't happen again.

No problem for me.

I really didn't give this thing much thought.

It was if Foxworthy or other comics...showed a picture ot a
stereotypical hillbilly...and said...

'that female on his left is his DAUGHTER...not his wife.'

Big laugh...but they, TOO, dismiss the very serious problem of
pedophilia.

I'm against it (what a politician I am)...but it's a pretty typical
hillbilly joke.

In fact...please stay...and I'll find you a beauty.

Something like Foxworthy saying...'his mother is also his sister...but
theyze from the souf'...so it's common'.

Don't drag it on.

Ask whatever you wish...and I'll be more than glad to respond.

Comedic stereotypes are by nature...in poor taste.

Just call me Shecky.

Elmo quoted:

" "Most smart 20-something women"?

As in plural? There's more than one?"

Oh, Elmo, there you go making a joke again.